Ancient Astronauts And Contemporary Skepticism

Over the course of the previous 12 months, I closely assisted a colleague in writing a sequence of ten articles covering various facets of my historic astronaut principle. All ten of these articles circulated extensively around the globe and think about counters on many websites indicated plentiful readership, however feedback to me, or to her, from anyplace, was non-existent. There was neither criticism nor acclaim from anybody. Just silence. I was starting to assume that perhaps no one in world desires to take ancient astronauts significantly.

In an attempt to make some progress, I decided to pay sixty dollars for a evaluation of my ancient astronaut website. Of course, this was to be a overview by skeptics; a overview by New Age believers can be worthless. Their blog’s description was “important critiques of paranormal claims on the Internet.” The middleman granted them 5 days to perform their review but that has long since come and gone, and never a word from them. My web site presents an unlimited quantity of proof and, in reality, I couldn’t anticipate anybody to produce a good essential overview in just five days. No one, together with myself, would want to see rapidly prepared and frivolous arguments, else I would make them look ridiculous in my counter arguments. Moreover, a few of my proof comes from Spanish-language sources and, to start out, they would want time to verify that none of it’s a hoax. They are welcome to all the time they need.

What to expect from this blog is unsure. There are skeptics who’re as narrow-minded in their pondering as their New Age counterparts, after which once more, there are skeptics, like me, who objectively evaluate the evidence to reach at the reality. Was there an actual historic astronaut? To help the skeptics answer that question, I’ll give them some concepts on the right way to refute my theories. Here, solely for space issues, I will focus on the archaeological evidence, leaving aside ideas on learn how to refute the cryptology and theology proof for one more day.

My web site reproduces engravings from the Tiwanaku civilization in Bolivia. A kind of engravings depicts the alleged historic astronaut as an aquatic with a three-pronged tail, with each of the three prongs ending in a pod. How do the skeptics refute that? Simple. They simply have to demonstrate that the shape of these pods resembles some type of animal or plant life to be found in that area. In other words, they need to discover a terrestrial supply for these engravings, otherwise my extraterrestrial arguments stay unharmed.      The timing of the Tiwanaku sky-god drawings coincides with the timing of the Nazca Lines in Peru, so the traditional astronaut of both locations has to be one and the identical. For Nazca, the skeptics will discover many ready-made arguments, but I consider all of them weak. The mentality of the folks of Nazca cannot be assumed to be unique in human history. It has to be demonstrated that folks elsewhere also believed that the solar, moon, or sky-spirits had bodily eyes that would observe ground drawings. Alternatively, it has to be demonstrated that the people of Nazca worshipped birds, believing them to have cognitive intelligence.

The recorded engravings on the cosmological Sun Disk, alleged alien artifact, might prove to be the largest challenge for the skeptics. How are we to believe that the Andeans of the early sixteenth century a) knew that the Earth was round, b) knew that it was attainable to orbit the Earth, c) knew that sunlight placing the moon might replicate again to strike a spaceship, d) knew that the darkish clouds along the Milky Approach contained stars inside, and e) knew that water formed the basis of plant and animal evolution? Here the skeptics would want to find parallels within the history of western civilization. I look ahead to their response. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *